Black Scholarship or White Imperalism?

By Dr. Christopher Metzler

 

There has been considerable debate among my colleagues about Black scholars and the production of Black scholarship. On the one hand, some White academics complain that Black scholars spend too much time on “ghetto scholarship.” This usually refers to Critical Race Theory, Africana Studies, and the impact of racism on our lives, both historically and contemporaneously. On the other hand, some Black scholars argue that we have a responsibility to study, analyze and write about the continuing significance of race in a thoughtful and substantive matter.

 

The reality is that the halls of academe are dominated by many White, imperialistic scholars who are rarely taken to task when they write about cultural issues of their choosing, i.e., feminism, essentialism, etc. Yet, many of them see no problem with marginalizing Black studies. Moreover, many of the same ones proudly call themselves liberals and, as such, believe that their White privilege endows them with the inalienable right to judge African diaspora studies by ostensibly neutral standards. Of course, since they set the standards, they determine neutrality.

 

For all its talk about diversity, the academy lags shamefully and unapologetically behind corporate America in this regard. One only need be a member of the academy to experience the contradiction between what the members of the “ivory tower” say and what they do. So then, does this mean that if Black scholars take to heart the responsibility to interrogate the ways in which racism affects our people, we will have no recourse but to join the faculties of historically Black colleges and universities (HBCU’s)? Does it mean, moreover, that a generation of Black scholars will be discouraged from the pursuit of “black scholarship” if they expect promotion and tenure? Will we take the bait of imperialistic “liberal” scholars and model the segregated American society? For at least two reasons, the answer is a resounding no.

 

First, we have an obligation to study the continuing significance of race, whether on the faculties of majority institutions or HBCU’s. Second, in my experience, we need to confront the arrogance of so many White liberal academics who preach inclusion, yet routinely “Jump Jim Crow,” as they say. If we do not, we will do a disservice to academic freedom and the civil rights movement, both of which are critical to the advancement of our scholarship.

 

We should define for ourselves what scholarship is and then rigorously pursue it. I, for one, am tired of the academic institutions that airbrush Black faces onto their Web sites, while far too often relegating Black faculty to the institutional margins. Or they attempt to hire chief diversity officers, as if a CDO alone could change the deeply embedded culture of denigration and disrespect that many Black academics face.

When all is said and done, the goal posts for achievement are set up by the dominant culture in the academy. Many of us reach those goal posts, only to find that they have been moved. So, we have to ask ourselves, is this about “Black scholarship” or about the imperialistic, hegemonic nature of the academy?

 

 

Dr. Christopher Metzler is Associate Dean at Georgetown University.

Advertisements

7 responses to “Black Scholarship or White Imperalism?

  1. Pingback: A Moving History from the Era of Jim Crow « The Academy Speaks

  2. This is an important issue and must be examined. Thank you for your insight and direction.

  3. I agree with everything in the article by Dr Metzler, and wonder if any representatives from the “ivory tower” are willing to comment. Archeologist study the Mayans, ancient Rome, and others. National Geographic studies tribal communities. Where is the lack of intellectual enlightenment in those activities? Just like those who banded together to deny the disregard of the value of studying feminism, both Black Faculty and Staff need to band together to protect the value of such academic pursuits. Along with protecting the pursuit, protection is needed for faculty willing to research Black Diaspora from being denied promotions and recognition for thier work. Yet, we as community of Black Americans must find value in such an endeavor.

  4. I completely agree that Black Scholars have an obligation to continue to research and document the affects and effects of racism throughout the African Diaspora, whether we fall to the margins or not. I learned the exclusionary tactics of white imperialist the first week I began graduate school, which has continued for the seven years that I have attended. Now on the brink of graduating with Ph.D. in African American literature I am in a state of reflection, and the first thing that comes to mind is the way I was lured into a program that is non-existent. My push to student AAL was complex and taxing and based upon the treatment I have received over the last six year, I must have pissed off 80% of the full-time faculty in my department. My advise to young scholars is to push forward. We cannot sit back and re-allow many who disdain us to write our history, critique our literature, art, and music; however, we must also recognize the black faces in the ivory tower who betray us daily and with each publication they produce and write against them at every opportunity. Just ‘cuz the face of the director or chairman/woman is black does not guarantee that Black Scholars will move from the margin to the center.

    Happy Black Scholarship! 🙂

  5. I completely agree that Black Scholars have an obligation to continue to research and document the affects and effects of racism throughout the African Diaspora, whether we fall to the margins or not. I learned the exclusionary tactics of white imperialist the first week I began graduate school, which has continued for the seven years that I have attended. Now on the brink of graduating with Ph.D. in African American literature I am in a state of reflection, and the first thing that comes to mind is the way I was lured into a program that is non-existent. My push to studu AAL was complex and taxing and based upon the treatment I have received over the last six years, I must have pissed off 80% of the full-time faculty in my department. My advice to young scholars is to push forward. We cannot sit back and re-allow many who disdain us to write our history, critique our literature, art, and music; however, we must also recognize the black faces in the ivory tower who betray us daily with each publication they produce and write against them at every opportunity. Just ‘cuz the face of the director or chairman/woman is black does not guarantee that Black Scholars will move from the margin to the center.

    Happy Black Scholarship! 🙂

  6. Awesome article! I am going to show this to my friends.

  7. “On the other hand, some Black scholars argue that we have a responsibility to study, analyze and write about the continuing significance of race in a THOUGHTFUL AND SUBSTANTIVE MATTER.”

    I agree with this statement; however, it does seem like the majority of people ignore the capatilized part, whether it be AA studies, women’s studies, etc…

    “Archeologist study the Mayans”

    It is Maya unless your discussing their language, then it is Mayan.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s